iProject
iOracle
iLibrary
iCommunity
iScan
iBank
iDelphi
iNews
Login
Register to iKnow
Lost Password
Register for DELPHI Survey
WI-WE Bank
What is the WI-WE bank?
What is the WI-WE bank for?
Who can benefit from WI-WE bank?
Who can contribute to WI-WE bank?
Wild Cards
What is a Wild Card?
Scan for Wild Cards
Most popular Wild Card tags
Weak Signals
What is a Weak Signal?
Scan for Weak Signals
Most popular Weak Signal tags
WI-WE Scan
What is the scope of the scanning?
Scan for WI-WEs (advanced)
Scan for WI-WEs (simple)
Most popular WI-WE tags
quick scan
scan for
wiwe
wi
we
advanced
iKnow Project
learn about the iKnow project
description
objectives
workplan
methodology
team
activities
contact us
go community
WI-WE Progress
Progress:
100.00%
WWI-WE Version:
15
0
mandatory questions pending
19
questions total
19
questions answered
19
questions completed
0
questions pending
WI-WE Quick Navigation
nomination
Weak Signal project
Weak Signal theme
Weak Signal sub-theme
Weak Signal source
short name
abstract
description
manifestation
implications
importance
analysis
filters
main drivers
risks & opportunities
stakeholders' actions
interconnection
Grand Challenges
thematic relevance
ERA relevance
relevant research-friendly strategies
RTD & STI policy relevance
finalization
Wild Cards & Weak Signals Bank
learn about the WI-WE Bank
What is the WI-WE bank?
What is the WI-WE bank for?
What is a Wild Card?
What is a Weak Signal?
What is the scope of the scanning?
Who can benefit from WI-WE bank?
Who can contribute to WI-WE bank?
full screen tag cloud
general tag cloud
Wild Cards tag cloud
Weak Signals tag cloud
Popular WI-WE Tags
All Tags
Wild Cards
Weak Signals
Newsletter
Analysis
Back
Mapping Weak Signals
Inspired by:
workshops/meetings
» Concerns over socio-economic and humanities research "downgrade"
version
:
15
/ updated:
2011-01-28
id: #1533 / version id: #1341
mode:
VIEW
Originally submitted by:
Rafael Popper
List of all contributors by versions (
mouse over
)
Last changed by:
Rafael Popper
WI-WE status:
submitted
unpublished
archived
Source of inspiration
Workshops/Meetings
iKnow workshop country name
United Kingdom
Workshop date
February 2010
The source of the Weak Signal is
Based on the social sciences and humanities (SSH) expert group discussions at the iKNOW workshop in Manchester (February 2010) and a post in Research Fundamentals blog (December 2010) available at: http://fundermental.blogspot.com/2010/12/protecting-social-sciences-humanities.html
Signal's headline
(max. 9 words)
Concerns over socio-economic and humanities research "downgrade"
Signal's description
(approx. 150 words)
Please describe the Weak Signal (approx. 150 words)
The role of Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities as a stream (SSH) within the European Commission's Framework Programme is being changed. In particular, three issues have been highlighted by critical commentators and the University Association for Contemporary European Studies: (1) The perceived "downgrading" of SSH research as Directorate L for Science, Economy and Society (SES) has been discontinued. From January 1, 2011 SSH became a Unit under Directorate B for European Research Area but its role remains uncertain for people outside the EC; (2) the plan to abolish broader, long-term integrated projects in SSH in the next Framework Programme, in the course of moving to a focus on "grand challenges" in which social sciences may well feature only as ‘auxiliary’ disciplines to be mainstreamed into more applied work oriented more around other disciplines; and (3) the downsizing of funding for specifically socio-economic and humanities research projects in the 8th Framework Programme. Among the questions raised: Can fundamental social research questions be sufficiently addressed to fully inform more applied research? Might not whole areas of social enquiry, of vital importance to Europe’s future, be neglected as Grand Challenges are focused in more technical ways? Will the social researchers engaged in FP work be drawn more from consultancies and specific approaches to study (specific brands of economics, for instance), neglecting equally valid approaches that are less digestible by engineers and environmentalists?
Keywords
social sciences, humanities, SSH, FP8, funding, research, policy
Mini-description
(max. 250 characters)
Commentators following the discussions about the next European Commission Framework Programme for Research and Technology Development (FP8) are concerned about proposals to downgrade socio-economic and humanities research role and funding.
Signal's first apperance
2005-now
Signal's potential evolution
It could lead to...
issue
type of issue/development
potential impact on society
timeframe for the issue to become at least 50% probable
#1
Threat to social sciences across Europe, as FP restructuring intersects with squeeze on research funds in many countries.
new/emerging
mainly harmful
now-2015
#2
New Grand Challenges may require much closer integration of social and other fields of research, possibly with productive consequences.
new/emerging
neutral
now-2015
#3
Social sciences assigned secondary, support role in EC FP research (like in the first three FPs).
re-emerging
very harmful
now-2015
#4
Stress on competitiveness as underpinning issue in innovation (may be offset by other Grand Challenges).
re-emerging
mainly beneficial
now-2015
#5
Neglect of capacity to monitor and understand change, just as changes take on profound new forms.
continuation
harmful
now-2015
#6
End of research on particular areas of SSH which may be seen as "less important" for Europe (e.g. some behavioural and cognitive sciences and approaches, focus on inequities).
discontinuation
very harmful
now-2025
#7
Considerable reduction in research efforts addressing issues related to European identity, multiculturalism, multilingualism, social cohesion, democracy, participation, peace and international cooperation.
discontinuation
very harmful
now-2015
Under what assumption the Weak Signal might evolve.
Very weak and disconnected efforts to "protect" European SSH research do not manage to influence SSH-related discussions in the planning of the EC's 8th Framework Programme for RTD. Thus, socio-economic and humanities research becomes, at best, an "add-on service" to wider European research programmes (i.e. reactive analysis of implications of "grand challenges" on society).
Importance
please specify
please select
Level 3: important for the
European Union
Filters preventing the signal's monitoring
institutional
filters (rules, laws, regulations)
political
filters (party or ideological interests)
Comments on selection:
Internal EC discussions about FP8 may prevent many people from monitoring this signal.
Key driving forces of this signal
Please use these boxes to provide up to 2 drivers of HIGH importance. Click on HELP to see examples:
Driver 1
Driver 2
Economic
Growing pressures to translate research into economic value.
Major risks & opportunities associated to the signal
Please choose the most appropriate timeframe option(s) to which you would like to provide inputs.
Risks
Opportunities
before 2015
Sudden drop in the number of undergraduate and postgraduate students applying for social sciences and humanities related studies.
Potential stakeholders' actions
short-term actions
(now-2015)
longer-term
(after 2015)
Academic/Research sector
Evaluate the implications of lack of pan-European instruments supporting research on social sciences issues.
Signal's relevance for European Grand Challenges
where?
please justify:
particularly relevant
Europe
world
Ageing and other demographic tensions
Behavioural change
Coexistence and conflicts
Crime and terrorism
Social pathologies & ethics
Social exclusion & poverty
Social cohesion and diversity
Globalization vs. localization
Innovation dynamics
Signal's relevance for thematic research areas
please justify:
particularly relevant
Social Sciences and Humanities
Science in society
Pan-European strategies influencing the signal
please justify:
particularly relevant
Strengthening research institutions and universities
Facilitating and promoting knowledge sharing and transfer
Research-friendly strategies
potentially improving understanding of the signal
For further information about 'research-friendly strategies'
click here
please justify:
particularly relevant
Overcoming sub-criticality and systemic failures
To be subcritical means that the effort in a particular field or subfield lacks resources, equipment or a sufficient number of researchers to achieve a desired goal
Creating a closer link between researchers & policy-makers
(e.g. supporting both thematic and cross-cutting policies, highlighting the strategic purpose of the European Research Area, etc.
Signal's relevance for future R&D and STI policies
Note: RTD = research and technology development; STI = science, technology and innovation
This signal suggest that further research may be needed on the role and contributions of social sciences and humanities (SSH) research to the European STI landscape.
This site requires enabled JavaScript to work correctly. Please contact your administrator and ask him to enable JavaScript in your web browser, otherwise many features will be unavailable.