iProject
iOracle
iLibrary
iCommunity
iScan
iBank
iDelphi
iNews
Login
Register to iKnow
Lost Password
Register for DELPHI Survey
WI-WE Bank
What is the WI-WE bank?
What is the WI-WE bank for?
Who can benefit from WI-WE bank?
Who can contribute to WI-WE bank?
Wild Cards
What is a Wild Card?
Scan for Wild Cards
Most popular Wild Card tags
Weak Signals
What is a Weak Signal?
Scan for Weak Signals
Most popular Weak Signal tags
WI-WE Scan
What is the scope of the scanning?
Scan for WI-WEs (advanced)
Scan for WI-WEs (simple)
Most popular WI-WE tags
quick scan
scan for
wiwe
wi
we
advanced
iKnow Project
learn about the iKnow project
description
objectives
workplan
methodology
team
activities
contact us
go community
WI-WE Progress
Progress:
87.92%
WWI-WE Version:
1
0
mandatory questions pending
19
questions total
16
questions answered
16
questions completed
3
questions pending
WI-WE Quick Navigation
nomination
Weak Signal project
Weak Signal theme
Weak Signal sub-theme
Weak Signal references
short name
abstract
description
manifestation
implications
importance
analysis
filters
main drivers
risks & opportunities
stakeholders' actions
interconnection
Grand Challenges
thematic relevance
RTD & STI policy relevance
finalization
Wild Cards & Weak Signals Bank
learn about the WI-WE Bank
What is the WI-WE bank?
What is the WI-WE bank for?
What is a Wild Card?
What is a Weak Signal?
What is the scope of the scanning?
Who can benefit from WI-WE bank?
Who can contribute to WI-WE bank?
full screen tag cloud
general tag cloud
Wild Cards tag cloud
Weak Signals tag cloud
Popular WI-WE Tags
All Tags
Wild Cards
Weak Signals
Newsletter
Analysis
Back
Mapping Weak Signals
Inspired by:
FP7
» Some opinion shift towards pro-nuclear power
version
:
1
/ created:
2009-09-23
id: #149 / version id: #149
mode:
VIEW
Originally submitted by:
Tuomo Kuosa
List of all contributors by versions (
mouse over
)
Last changed by:
Tuomo Kuosa
WI-WE status:
submitted
unpublished
Source of inspiration
European Commission Framework Programme for RTD
(FP7)
Theme/activity of inspiration
Theme 5 - Energy
Sub-theme/area of inspiration
Knowledge for energy policy-making
Optional reference/s to FP7 project/s
Use the following format: Project Acronym (Project Reference No.). Use commas if more than one project is associated to this Wild Card, for example: ALFA-BIRD (213266), SAFAR (213374), LAPCAT-II (211485)
Singapore's Global Monitor Project
Signal's headline
(max. 9 words)
Some opinion shift towards pro-nuclear power
Signal's description
(approx. 150 words)
Please describe the Weak Signal (approx. 150 words)
Finland, China and US are currently building nuclear power plants and planning to start new constructions. The public opinion in these countries has changed towards more fission friendly after long political debates and discussions in media. Furthermore, Sweden canceled its decision to close its nuclear plants. Mandatory reduction of CO2 emmissions and vulnerability of Russian energy supplies have been two drivers behind.
Keywords
nuclear power, fission, value, energy production, energy demands
Signal's first apperance
2005-now
Signal's potential evolution
It could lead to...
issue
type of issue/development
potential impact on society
timeframe for the issue to become at least 50% probable
#1
Construction of nuclear power may rise to the political agenda of EU contries
re-emerging
mainly beneficial
now-2025
Under what assumption the Weak Signal might evolve.
A potential political trigger could be, for example, political energy supply game played by Russia, and EC’s decision to finance nuclear power R&D as an answer to CO2 emmission reduction. More contries start constructions of new plants.
Importance
please specify
please select
Level 3: important for the
European Union
Filters preventing the signal's monitoring
cultural/religious
filters (values, traditions, faith, spiritual beliefs)
institutional
filters (rules, laws, regulations)
affective
filters (emotions, anxiety, self-doubt)
political
filters (party or ideological interests)
social
filters (class, status, education level)
Comments on selection:
There are many filters which prevent us from noticing this WE. First of all most of the EU countries and their citizens still consider that building nuclear power is highly risky, and secondly they consider it as undesired for the environment.
Key driving forces of this signal
Please use these boxes to provide up to 2 drivers of HIGH importance. Click on HELP to see examples:
Driver 1
Driver 2
Technological/Scientific
It possible
Economic
It profitable and affordable
Environmental
It reduces CO2 emissions
Political
it reduces dependence of Russian energy
Major risks & opportunities associated to the signal
Please choose the most appropriate timeframe option(s) to which you would like to provide inputs.
Risks
Opportunities
between 2015-2025
Nuclear catastrophy, terrorist actions
Energy sufficiency in EU
between 2025-2050
Tensions between EU, Russia and formal oil contries
More peace full global politics
Potential stakeholders' actions
short-term actions
(now-2015)
longer-term
(after 2015)
Policy actors (at the international, European and national levels)
Be prepared for avallanche of opinion shifts
Funding R&D
Signal's relevance for European Grand Challenges
where?
please justify:
particularly relevant
Europe
world
Energy security/dynamics
Techno-security, hazard & risk
Signal's relevance for thematic research areas
please justify:
particularly relevant
Energy
Environment (including Climate Change)
Security
Nuclear research
Signal's relevance for future R&D and STI policies
Note: RTD = research and technology development; STI = science, technology and innovation
Not very much
This site requires enabled JavaScript to work correctly. Please contact your administrator and ask him to enable JavaScript in your web browser, otherwise many features will be unavailable.